February 2nd, 2009 by Oskar Kennedy

When I saw the “breaking news” items on the story of the California woman who gave birth to a litter of octuplets with in vitro fertilization, I said it out loud. “She just wants to get on television.” I was immediately remonstrated by my Lovely Wife, who asserted that the mother had been very careful to keep her identity secret. She was, my Lovely Wife insisted, trying hard to protect her own privacy, and just wanted to be left alone to raise her private army family in peace.
Because I have the utmost respect for my Lovely Wife (who is smart and intuitive, as well as beautiful), I accepted her assessment of the situation without argument. I am, after all, a cranky, suspicious bastard, with a cynical streak that is visible from space. Quite often, my Lovely Wife’s perspective is more considered than my knee-jerk negativity. Inside, however, I was skeptical. (I was also hungry, as I recall, but I was mostly skeptical.)
It turns out, my knee-jerk negativity wasn’t so knee-jerky after all.
Nadya Suleman, the mother at the center of the controversy, is trying to raise two million dollars from media interviews in order to defray the cost of raising her brood, which includes six additional siblings already waiting at home. After she’s done making the talk-show rounds, Ms. Suleman is planning a career as a “television childcare expert.” Her qualifications include: 1. an undergraduate degree in child and adolescent development, 2. being so (in her mother’s words) “obsessed with children” that she sought an unusual fertility treatment despite having six children under the age of eight, and 3. being persuasive/persistent enough to obtain the treatment, despite the fact that it conflicts with every ethical guideline in reproductive medicine.
I’m not sure which is worse. If she’s genuinely got a psychiatric disorder, and this is the unfortunate result, or if she’s just a publicity hound who watched too many shows about parents of multiples, and saw a way to get her own series on TLC. But either way, choosing to raise 14 children as an unemployed single mother, and then exploiting those children in order to get yourself a television career, is deplorable.
I don’t like to second guess other people’s parenting decisions. You’ve got to be doing something really dangerous or absurd (see anti-vaccinationists) before I’ll jump up on the soapbox and tell you that you’re raising your kids wrong. I’m going to go out on a limb and say that this isn’t quite as bad as undermining individual and group resistance to preventable diseases, but it’s still pretty awful.
The dilemma that arises is, what to do about it? Should these children be removed from their home, to the uncertainty of adoption or foster care? Should Ms. Suleman be left to her own devices, or be subjected to some sort of state monitoring? And what happens if she decides her small village current family is no longer cute enough, and she decides to have another half-dozen? Thoughts?